Impact Factor List (Released in June 2022). Click here to access

AlbusScientific.ca
AlbusScientific.ca
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Editorial Board
  • Latest Articles
  • Archives
  • Author's Instructions
  • Advisory Board
  • Review Process
  • Preprints
  • Supplementary Issues
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • Publication Ethics
  • Scientific Activities
  • Capacity Building
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Social Media
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Journals
    • Editorial Board
    • Latest Articles
    • Archives
    • Author's Instructions
    • Advisory Board
    • Review Process
    • Preprints
    • Supplementary Issues
    • Abstracting & Indexing
    • Publication Ethics
    • Scientific Activities
    • Capacity Building
    • Copyright and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Social Media
    • Announcements
    • Contact Us
  • Sign In

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Editorial Board
  • Latest Articles
  • Archives
  • Author's Instructions
  • Advisory Board
  • Review Process
  • Preprints
  • Supplementary Issues
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • Publication Ethics
  • Scientific Activities
  • Capacity Building
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Social Media
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Peer Review Process

Peer Review

All submitted manuscripts at the first step are handeled by the editorial office. Section Editors provide oversight for manuscripts submitted to their section with Associate Editors acting as handling editors. Only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. Those papers judged by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advice from field experts). 


In the second step manuscripts are sent for formal review. Albus Scientia uses a transparent and neutral peer review system. Reviewer's selection is critical to the publication process and we choose qualified independent reviewers from available database, or alternatively honors authors to suggest suitable independent field related reviewers with no potential conflicts of interest but the editor's decision on the choice of referees is final. 


All contributions submitted to Albus Scientia selected for peer review are sent to at least two, but usually three or more, independent reviewers, selected by the editors. Acceptance /decisions on manuscripts is solely made on the recommendation of the Editor-in-Chief in the light of peer-review reports. 

Criteria for Suggested Reviewers

The authors can propose the neutral reviewers/referees from a different institute, who are neither current collaborators of the author/co-authors nor have published with any of the author/co-authors of the manuscript within the last five years.


The contact information may please be provided in the following format;


Name of the reviewer/referee         __________________________________


Affiliation                              ________________________________________


Email address              ____________________________________________


Home page or Google Scholar Profile (optional) _____________________


Copyright © 2022 AlbusScientific.ca - All Rights Reserved.

  • Author's Instructions
  • Review Process
  • Abstracting & Indexing
  • Publication Charges
  • Publication Ethics
  • Scientific Activities
  • Privacy Policy
  • Social Media
  • Educational Services
  • Terms and Conditions

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept